U.S. Court of Appeals Rejects Legal Challenge Claiming Cannabis Prohibition is Unconstitutional – Ganjapreneur | Where to order Skittles Moonrock online
Learn where to order CBD Vape online. TOP QUALITY GRADE A++
Cannabyss Inc. is the best place online to buy top quality weed, cannabis, vape, marijuana and CBD products. Get your borderless orders delivered at the pickup spot with ease. Top Grade products for client satisfaction.
👉 Click here to Visit our shop! 🛒

Wed / May 28th
by TG Branfalt
A lawsuit filed by Massachusetts cannabis businesses that argued cannabis prohibition could no longer be considered constitutional has been rejected by the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals.
Full story after the jump.
advertisement
The U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday rejected a challenge by Massachusetts cannabis businesses that argued cannabis prohibition could no longer be considered constitutional, as ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, Reuters reports. Lawyers for the businesses contended that Congress had abandoned its goal of controlling all cannabis in interstate commerce, which was a predicate of the Supreme Court ruling.
In the 2005 case, Gonzales v. Raich, the Supreme Court found that the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the authority to criminalize cannabis possession and use even in states that allow medical cannabis use, and Congress used that power for the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
During arguments before the appeals court, attorney David Boies noted that Congress, in 2010, permitted Washington, D.C. to move forward with medical cannabis legalization through a rider in an appropriations bill; however, Chief U.S. Circuit Judge David Barron, writing for a three-judge panel, said that the rider was of “limited scope” and did not apply to the cultivation and distribution of cannabis for non-medical purposes.
“After all, notwithstanding those appropriation riders, the CSA remains fully intact as to the regulation of the commercial activity involving marijuana for non-medical purposes, which is the activity in which the appellants, by their own account, are engaged.” — Barron, in the ruling, via Reuters
Barron said that ruling in favor of the plaintiffs would result in a nationwide exemption of the CSA’s drug schedule, which would be broader than what the Supreme Court rejected in 2005, which concerned only medical cannabis.
U.S. District Judge Mark Mastroianni last year rejected similar arguments made by the Massachusetts businesses, ruling that only the Supreme Court could overturn the 2005 ruling upholding the law.
Get daily cannabis business news updates. Subscribe
Have an additional perspective to share? Send us a message to let us know, and if your comment is chosen by our editors it could be featured here.
Ganjapreneur is made possible by our partners:
advertisement
Latest Cannabis News
Ohio GOP Seeking to Change Voter-Approved Adult-Use Cannabis Law
London Mayor Backs Cannabis Decriminalization
Study: Cannabis Legalization Associated With Reduced Prescription Drug Claims
Texas Set to Expand Medical Cannabis Program After Passing THC Ban
Texas Ag. Commissioner Says Hemp Farmers Won’t Be Affected by THC Ban
Washington to Issue New Social Equity Cannabis Licenses This Summer
News by Market:
News by Topic:
- Stocks
- CBD
- Legalization
- Decriminalization
- Business
- Regulations
- Adult Use
- Medical Cannabis
- Social Equity
- Expungement
- Veterans
- Hemp Industry
- Events
- Politics
- Federal Policy
- Law Enforcement
- International
- Entrepreneurs
- Investing
- Licensing
- Banking
- Marketing
- Technology
- Celebrities
- Sports
- Popular Culture
- Normalization
- Extracts
- Edibles
- Lawsuits
Featured Business Profiles
From Our Partners
Stuck in the Past: How “Tobacco Use Only” Laws Are Crippling Accessory Retailers
Grant Mitchell
The Role of Terpenes in Blue Dream and Green Crack: What You Need to Know
DNA Genetics
Trends in Cannabis and Hemp Prerolls: Premium Options and Custom Formulas
HempNova
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!