us.-supreme-court-hears-rico-arguments-in-case-of-truck-driver-fired-over-failed-drug-test-–-ganjapreneur-|-how-to-buy-skittles-moonrock-online

U.S. Supreme Court Hears RICO Arguments in Case of Truck Driver Fired Over Failed Drug Test – Ganjapreneur | How to buy Skittles Moonrock online

Learn where to order weed online. TOP QUALITY GRADE A++

Cannabyss Inc. is the best place online to buy top quality weed, cannabis, vape, marijuana and CBD products. Get your borderless orders delivered at the pickup spot with ease. Top Grade products for client satisfaction.

šŸ‘‰ Click here to Visit our shop! šŸ›’

Wed / Oct 16th

by TG Branfalt

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments over whether a truck driver who was fired for failing a drug test after using a CBD product advertised as containing no THC can sue the manufacturer under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO.

Full story after the jump.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday heard arguments over whether a truck driver who was fired for failing a drug test after using a CBD wellness product can sue the manufacturer under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, the New York Times reports. Provisions of RICO require claimants to show injury to ā€œbusiness or propertyā€ and the truck driver, Douglas Horn, contends his business was injured by the product, Dixie X, which was advertised in High Times magazine asĀ containing no THC.

Horn sued Medical Marijuana Inc., Dixie Holdings, and Red Dice Holdings under RICO, claiming the companies engaged in a pattern of racketeering carried on through an enterprise that included mail and wire fraud. Under RICO, courts can award triple damages to plaintiffs that show the defendantā€™s racketeering activity injured them in their business or property, a phrase the Supreme Court previously determined excludes personal injury.

A federal trial judge has ruled that Hornā€™s injury is personal, rather than ā€œbusiness or property.ā€ During the arguments, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson disagreed saying Horn is not claiming that he got ill because of the product.ā€

ā€œHeā€™s not saying he was personally injured. He didnā€™t even know that he had ingested THC until the testing and the firing.ā€ ā€” Brown via the Times

Justice Clarence Thomas seemed to believe that Horn did not meet the burden under Rico, saying that ā€œMedical marijuana did not fire you.ā€

The courtā€™s decision is likely to come in June or July.

Get daily cannabis business news updates. Subscribe

Have an additional perspective to share? Send us a message to let us know, and if your comment is chosen by our editors it could be featured here.

Ganjapreneur is made possible by our partners:

Latest Cannabis News

Wed / Oct 16th

News by Market:

News by Topic:

View all news Get email updates

Featured Business Profiles

Create a profile View all categories

From Our Partners

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

New Purchase

Somebody from [variable_2] has just bought [variable_3] [amount] minutes ago.