Former METRC Executive Files federal whistleblower lawsuit accusing the company of enabling illegal marijuana diversion and retaliating against him after he raised concerns about the alleged practice internally. | Cannabis Law Report | Where to buy Skittles Moonrock online
Learn how to buy CBD online. TOP QUALITY GRADE A++
Cannabyss Inc. is the best place online to buy top quality weed, cannabis, vape, marijuana and CBD products. Get your borderless orders delivered at the pickup spot with ease. Top Grade products for client satisfaction.
š Click here to Visit our shop! š
Iāve been saying for years how dangerous a METRC monopoly will prove to be and hereās a perfect example
A lot more to come on this case and more to come across the country, I bet you your bottom dollar
Maine Wire
A former executive at Metrc, Inc., a major provider of cannabis tracking systems that is active in Maine, has filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit accusing the company of enabling illegal marijuana diversion and retaliating against him after he raised concerns about the alleged practice internally.
The lawsuit could have serious implications for Maine, where Office of Cannabis Policy Executive Director John Hudak is already facing a Government Oversight Committee investigation for his own ties to Metrc, as well as for several contracts the firm holds with the state. The probe, unanimously approved by the committee in February, centers on Hudakās past business relationship with a Metrc executive and his role in negotiating a lucrative contract amendment between Maine regulatory office and the company.
In a 21-page complaint filed April 4 in U.S. District Court in Oregon (see below), Marcus Estes alleges that Metrc and its subsidiary Metrc ID, LLC fired him after he reported what he believed to be evidence that the company was āparticipating in a conspiracyā with California cannabis regulators to allow the flow of cannabis into the illicit market.
[RELATED: Maine Cannabis Chief Investigated Over Potential Conflict of Interest with METRCā¦]
Estes, who was hired as an executive vice president after Metrc acquired his blockchain tracking startup in 2023, claims the companyās flagship āradio-frequency identificationā (RFID) tracking system fails to meet contractual obligations to flag irregularities in cannabis distributionāa core safeguard required under California law.
According to the complaint, Estes came to believe that Metrc āwas essentially providing coverā for illegal distribution operations known as āburner distros,ā which use legitimate licenses to buy cannabis legally and then sell it illicitly, often across state lines.
Marijuana business owners have frequently told the Maine Wire that Metrc is known within their community to be vulnerable to exploitation and subversion by illicit operators, even as regulators have presented Metrcās services as a safeguard against black market cannabis trafficking.
āMetrc is well aware of the DCCās failures and simply keeps quiet about them in order to maintain their plum position and their contract worth more than $40 million per year,ā the complaint alleges, referencing Californiaās Department of Cannabis Control. Estes contends that Metrcās system ādoes nothing to flag irregularitiesā and that the company benefits from the status quo, which is āat the expense of the cannabis industry in general.ā
Estes claims he informed his supervisor at the company of these concerns in June 2023, following a meeting with a California cannabis operator who described how easily Metrcās system could be exploited to enable diversion.
āI wouldnāt talk to anyone about this,ā Estes recalls his supervisor responding, adding that āflagging irregularities āwas not our job.āā
Following this exchange, the complaint alleges, Estes was stripped of his responsibilities, excluded from key product meetings, and ultimately terminated in March 2024ājust nine days before his stock options were due to vest.
Also see
MJ Biz
Metrc allowing rampant illegal marijuana activity, former employee claims in lawsuit
Metrcās case against him mid 2024
https://archive.org/details/gov.uscourts.flmd.428075


Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!